Recovery Priorities Socio-economic Infrastructure Affected Territories: International Experience

Authors

  • Inna Zablodska Doctor of Economics, Professor, State Organization “V. Mamutov Institute of Economic and Legal Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Svitlana Hrechana PhD, Docent, State Organization “V. Mamutov Institute of Economic and Legal Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Yaroslav Bielousov Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor, Management and Marketing, V. Dahl East Ukrainian National University, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Oksana Romakhova PhD, Docent, State Organization “V. Mamutov Institute of Economic and Legal Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Yevhen Kovalchuk Postgraduate, V. Dahl East Ukrainian National University, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Serhii Filkovskyi Postgraduate, Institute of Industrial Economics of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

Abstract

The article examines the key aspects of restoring socio-economic infrastructure in affected territories based on international experience of post-war and post-crisis reconstruction. The main approaches to defining recovery priorities are analyzed, including human-centered, economically oriented, integrated, and build-back-better approaches, and international practices of their implementation are systematized. It is established that classical post-conflict recovery models are based on a sequential approach implemented under conditions of a stable security environment. It is shown that in Ukraine the recovery process takes place under conditions of ongoing hostilities, high uncertainty, and a limited planning horizon, which leads to the formation of a non-linear and dynamic system of priority-setting. It is determined that the absence of a formally established long-term recovery framework is partially compensated by the emergence of new institutional coordination mechanisms. The results indicate the feasibility of transitioning toward the formation of an adaptive system of prioritization that correlates with international practices, acquires specific features shaped by the war, and is characterized by a tendency toward strengthening the human-centered approach as one of the key vectors of further development. 

Keywords: recovery, socio-economic infrastructure, international experience, post-war reconstruction, Ukraine, development priorities

Downloads

Published

2026-06-01

How to Cite

Zablodska, I. ., Hrechana, S. ., Bielousov, Y., Romakhova, O. ., Kovalchuk, Y. ., & Filkovskyi, S. . (2026). Recovery Priorities Socio-economic Infrastructure Affected Territories: International Experience. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 15(2), 973. Retrieved from http://ecsdev.org/ojs/index.php/ejsd/article/view/2027

Issue

Section

Articles